|
CONTENTS
Economic Impacts of National Generic Dairy
Advertising
The Impact of Generic Fluid Milk Advertising
on Whole, Lowfat, and Skim Milk Demand
Generic Advertising Wearout: The Case of the
NYC Fluid Milk Campaign
Manager's Viewpoint
Editor's Notes
Directors Corner
Selected Reading
Next Meeting
|
NEC-63
2002 Next Meeting
Date xx-yy, 2002
Albuquerque,
New Mexico
Allocation Issues in
Check-off Programs
|
|
Generic Advertising Wearout:
The Case of the New York City Fluid Milk Campaign
by Carlos Reberte
Harry M. Kaiser
John E. Lenz
Olan Forker
In a forthcoming NICPRE research bulletin, we examine the issue of advertising
wearout in the New York City market. Between 1986 and 1992, New York dairy
farmers made annual investments in the range of $2.1 to $4.2 million in
generic fluid milk advertising in this market. As this is the largest
fluid milk market in New York, dairy farmers are interested in ensuring
that the money they invest in their advertising program in this market
produces an effective campaign. For most of the 1986-92 period, new commercials,
with or without a shift in the general advertising message, were deployed
annually. Given the substantial production costs required to produce new
advertisements, dairy farmers and their program managers are, understandably,
interested in research aimed at determining whether annual re-tooling
to lessen advertising wearout is necessary or desirable.
Building on a study conducted by Kinnucan, Chang, and Venkateswaran,
we estimated a time-varying parameter model which allows, but does not
require, advertising to exhibit varying effectiveness over time. Based
on creative content, we grouped the commercials that ran in New York City
during the 1986-92 period into two campaigns. The first campaign focussed
on milks nutritional benefits, while the second was aimed at increasing
fluid milk consumption by adults.
The results of our model indicated that the impact of generic advertising
on fluid milk sales in New York city evolved over each campaign following
a bell-shaped pattern. Our results also indicated that the first campaign
was effective for twice as long as the second campaign and that it had
a higher peak and a higher average advertising elasticity. By accounting
for the dynamic nature of advertising responses, program managers and
boards of directors can enhance their strategic planning in the areas
of campaign duration, copy replacement, and expenditure allocations over
time.
|