| Newsletter TOC | CCPRP | NICPRE | NEC 63 |
![]() |
NICPRE QUARTERLY
|
|
|
A newsletter from
the National Institute for Commodity Promotion Research and Evaluation
on program evaluation and related issues
|
||
| Vol. 5 No. 4 |
Fourth Quarter 2001
|
|
|
CONTENTS Advertising's Relative Impact on Milk Consumption Have Expenditures to Advertise California Amonds been Effective? Directors Corner
|
Director's Cornerby Harry M. Kaiser I am delighted to report that NICPRE has been chosen to do the annual
economic evaluation of the national dairy farmer and fluid milk processor
checkoff programs. These two checkoff programs are the largest programs
in the U.S., and by law, are required to have annual evaluations in terms
of their economic impacts. However, until recently, the annual evaluations
were always conducted by economists in the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
A couple of years ago, the USDA adopted an economic model developed and
maintained by NICPRE, and last year NICPRE subcontracted with the USDA
to do the analysis. This year, we will dramatically overhaul the model
by replacing much of the aggregate market data with A.C. Nielsen household
data to improve our economic estimates of program impacts on the demand
side. To help us conduct the necessary research for this project, we have
hired Todd Schmit, who is taking a leave from the Ph.D. program at Cornell
University. Some of you will remember Todd from his excellent work with
NICPRE on our economic evaluation of the American Egg Board and the California
Egg Board two years ago. Another new member of the team is Dr. Brian Gould
from the University of Wisconsin, who is an expert in demand systems and
in micro-household data. We look forward to working with the USDA on this
important project over the next several years. |
|